Every Diwali there are šnumerous news reports of police keeping a strict vigil on gambling activities and raids on gambling activities even in residential apartments. Thus the legitimate question that arises is whether private gambliš³ng on festive occasions is illegal under the Public Gambling Act, 1867 and other laws.
The clear answer to this doubt is that gambling in a private enclosure where there is no invitation to members of the public at large and where there is no element of āprofit or gainā for the owners, organisers or managers of the premises is not illegal. Gambling isš only prohibited in a ācommon gaming houseā or in a public place when therą¼e is an element of commercial motive for the organisers.
Various Courts in India have made similar observations legitimising gambling during festivities and accepting this practice ofgaming during auspicious occasions for āshagunā or good fortune. In Mani Ram v. State, AIR 1954 P & H 154, the Punjab & Haryana High Court recognised this in the following terms: āIn the present case we find that the occasion was two days before Diwali and it is a matter of common knowledge that in these days Hindus indulge in a great deal of gambling because it is considered auspicious. Again Mani Ram is a Municipal employee and it is not been shown that he has derived any profit or gain from gambling either on this occasion or any other occasion. The presence of a pot containing some money near his knee is scarcely evidence of the fact that he was taking a share of the winnings of the other personsā¦ā
Similarly in In Re: Nimmagadda Raghavalu & Others, AIR 1953 Mad 243, the Madras High Court noted,āGambling is not an offence and it becomes one only when it takes place in a common gaming house or a public placeā¦The mere fact that occasionally people used to play cards and perhaps for money does not necessarily make it a common gaming houseā¦The presumption of gambling on Diwali is not so strong as the gambling at other times...A person simply allowing the use of his house to gamblers during Diwali festival without any idea of demanding rent, etc., cannot be said to be keeping a common gaming houseā¦Gambling on Diwali day should not be considered to be an offenceā¦ā
Again in Subba Rao v. The King, AIR 1951 Pat 405, the Patna High Court observed, āIt is only an offence to gamble in a common gaming houseā¦It appears that the accused merely met on the Diwali night for a friendly game of cards in the house of one of themā¦That does not constitute as an offence under the Gambling Actā¦ā
Thus, only if one is gambling in an establishment where gambling is organised for a commercial motive would the activity be termed as illegal. Again Section 5 of the Public Gambling Act and other similar provisions in state laws requires an authorised police officer to issue a searcą·“h warrant only if there is a suspicion that a premise is used as a ācommon gaming houseā and these powers have to be used sparingly and only on reasonable grounds.