Legal Heavyweights Battle it out in Dream11 GST Evasion case
The Bombay ꦇHigh Court has filed by the central government on the manner of payment of Goods and Services Tax (GST) by Dream11 to 19th March, 2020.
A division bench of the Bombay High Court comprising of Justices Ranjit More and Bh🎃arati Dangre was earlier supposed to hear the review petition filed by the Union of India in the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by advocate and social activist Gurdeep Singh Sachar in-chamber on 11th February, but on the hearing date decided to adjourn the matter by more than a month.
According to the order of the court, senior advocate and former Attorney General of India Mukul Rohatgi (who has also represented the fantasy company in several earlier hearings in the Supreme Court on related matters) along with senior counsel Vikram Nankani app𒈔eared for Dream11, while Additional Solicitor General of India Anil C. Singh appeared for the central government and counsels Yogesh Naidu and Sarosh Damania appeared for Sachar.
It may be noted that Sachar in the Bombay High Court in April ♚2019 alleging that online fantasy sports operator Dream11 conducts gambling operations and wrongly pays Goods and Services Tax (GST) only at the rate of 18% on the margin retained by the company, instead of 28% on the face value of bets under Rule 31A of the Central GST Rul♛es.
A division bench of the Bombay High Court compꦕrising of Justices Ranjit More and Bharati Dangre had dismissed Sachar’s petition and ruled in Dream11’s favour on 30th 𒁏April, 2019.
Sachar as well as the Union of India, State of Maharashtra and activists Varun Gumber and Avinash Mehtrotra had filed appeals/applications against the order o🗹f the Bombay High Court in the Supreme Court.
However, through separate 😼orders, the Supreme Court as well as the , but allowed the government to🌼 file a limited review on the GST issue in the Bombay High Court.
On 31st January, 2020 a Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Rohinton F. Narim♛an and S. Ravindra Bhat a clarification application filed by Sachar and noted that the issue of whether gambling is or is not involved in Dream11 cannot be revisited by the Bombay High Court.
Notwithstanding the Supreme Court order restricting arguments on the gambling/betting issue, the central government in its review petition contended that gambling/betting is involv𝄹ed in Dream11 and has claimed revenue implications of over Rs. 2100 cro🥃res in the matter.
The government in itsಞ petition has also relied on judgments of the Kerala, Madras and Gujarat High Courts ruling rummy and poker when ဣplayed for stakes to be gambling.
The central government has also claimed that there is collusive behaviour between the PIL petitioner Sachar and Drea𒁃m11 as well as🎉 violation of principles of natural justice since the original order was passed by the High Court without hearing it.
